top of page
Search

Why Marketing-Speak Is So Delicious Yet So Ineffective

  • Writer: Erin Hardy
    Erin Hardy
  • May 27
  • 7 min read

A gut-check for marketers, strategists, founders, and anyone who’s ever written “innovative solutions” with a straight face.



For the record, I’ve written “innovative solutions” possibly billions of times over the past 30 years. I’ve been part of the problem. I know from whence the problem came, and I’m trying to save yinz all.


So, the other day, I talked to someone who billed their company as a “growth agent.” As a writer, I was kind of impressed with how vague yet powerful that sounded. I also immediately thought of tumors, which I’m guessing was not the intended brand association.


I had to ask a few follow-up questions.


Turns out, the growth agent was a SaaS company. And yes, like many SaaS orgs, their software is designed to solve a ton of problems that impede organizational growth.


Now, in fairness, sure—most companies want to grow, so on the surface, “growth agent” seems like a good choice. But also, Miracle-Gro is a growth agent. Generic “growth” language is everywhere right now. We’re waist-deep in “growth engines,” “growth partners,” “growth accelerators,” “growth architects,” and probably “growth ninjas” somewhere deep in the cursed dumpster-fire corners of LinkedIn.


Please don’t make me ask Google what the heck you even do. Despite being Jessica Fletcher’s biggest fan, if I have to interrogate you like I’m trying to solve a murder mystery, your messaging might need another pass.


Which brings us to the cruel irony of effective messaging. Messaging that actually works is usually un-sexy.


Instead, it’s:

  • Specific

  • Practical

  • Outcome-focused

  • Relentlessly tied to customer problems


At times, it can feel almost too literal compared to the grandiose language everyone wants to use in brainstorming meetings.




So, yup, I am telling you that “boring” messaging will often outperform your visionary disruption manifesto.


Because it works. (And more sales are never a boring result.)


We All Know Marketing-Speak Is Bad. So, Why Do We Keep Doing It?


Here’s the ironically age-old central contradiction of marketing in our modern, jet-set world. Most marketers can spot marketing jargon instantly. Most marketers also accidentally write it every single week.


Why?


Because it’s fun.


Vague, dramatic, overconfident language makes you feel smart and polished. It feels strategic and brand-y and expensive. Marketing-speak gives everyone the comforting feeling that Serious Business Activities™ are occurring.


You know the phrases. We’ve all used them:


  • Cutting-edge solutions

  • End-to-end innovation

  • Transformative customer experiences

  • Driving operational excellence

  • Scalable synergies

  • Leveraging data-driven insights


Without being tied to an actual customer need, these kinds of phrases are empty. It’s not that these phrases aren’t true or real, but if you don’t lead with an answer to a customer problem, they’re not going to trust that you actually can transform their customer experience.


Your audience usually receives jargon in one of two ways:


  • They don’t even notice it

  • They don’t get it, and it makes them feel dumb


Either of those things is a catastrophic outcome for brand messaging.


I get it. I really do. Marketing jargon is delicious. It slides beautifully into presentation decks. It makes websites feel polished and premium.


But it’s basically the Little Debbie Snack Cake of business writing—immediately satisfying, but capable of causing long-term lethargy.


B2B customers are usually asking much simpler questions:


  • Will this save me time?

  • Can this make me money?

  • Is this risk-reducing?

  • Will this make my job easier?

  • Does this prevent headaches?

  • Can I trust you?


Nobody wakes up hoping to “experience seamless innovation.”



Marketing-Speak Exists to Flatter the Company


A lot of marketing jargon exists to make the company feel impressive—not to help the customer understand anything.


Again, I understand why.


Everybody inside an organization has their own version of what “important” sounds like.


  • Product teams love features

  • Founders love vision statements

  • Sales teams want certainty and hype

  • Agencies want to sound strategic

  • Executives want to be “wowed” with show-stopping language


The result is often messaging designed for internal validation instead of customer clarity. It’s how you end up with headlines like:


Delivering transformative enterprise solutions for the modern marketplace.


Mmmkay. Great.


But what does that actually mean?


I have questions.


  • Does it help me make payroll faster?

  • Does it help me avoid lawsuits?

  • Does it stop my operations team from drowning in spreadsheets?

  • Does it make my customers happier?

  • Does it save me six hours every Friday?

  • Does it have anything to do with Star Trek?


Nobody is asking for a “growth agent,” “innovation ecosystem,” or “synergistic business accelerator.”


They’re looking for:


  • Fewer problems

  • Less wasted time

  • More revenue

  • Lower risk

  • A trusted partner


When Smart Teams Accidentally Create Terrible Messaging


Bad messaging is rarely created by dumb people.


Some of the worst messaging I’ve ever seen came from rooms full of extremely intelligent people with good intentions.


Without solid parameters, messaging workshops slowly devolve into slogan soup. Stakeholders repeat internal terminology. Teams try to sound “premium.” Everyone wants their favorite feature included. People want to feel represented in the final messaging, and eventually, the copy becomes an awkward hostage negotiation between departments.


When we’re all terrified of sounding too simple, clarity slowly dies. Abstraction is politically safe. Nobody gets fired for approving language like, “Scalable solutions for modern enterprises.”


However, somebody in the room might absolutely object that they’re not “wowed” by something like, “Stop wasting six hours a week building reports manually.”


One is vague. One makes a promise. Vague language survives committees better because specific messaging creates accountability, and accountability can be quite uncomfortable.


Marketing-speak also survives because it protects people internally. Vague language gives teams room to reinterpret success later. It allows companies to sound ambitious without making specific promises. It creates flexibility for internal stakeholders.


Your customers experience that vagueness very differently. To them, it sounds evasive, interchangeable, or exhausting.


The Hidden Cost of Marketing-Speak


I can stay on my soapbox all day, but when you think about the actual business impact, ineffective messaging goes from sounding expensive to actually being expensive. It quietly does a lot of damage. It can:


  • Reduce trust, fast

  • Water down differentiation

  • Increase cognitive load

  • Hide the actual value proposition

  • Kill the emotional connection

  • Turn websites into wallpaper copy nobody remembers


When everybody is innovative, customer-centric, industry-leading, and data-driven, nobody is. Words are symbols for meaning, and jargon eventually means nothing. If your messaging sounds interchangeable, your company starts to feel interchangeable, too.


What Effective Brand Messaging Actually Does


Okay, enough of roasting marketing jargon for a minute. Let’s talk about what effective messaging actually looks like.


The first, most important thing that effective messaging does is make understanding effortless. Like the coolest people you know, effective messaging usually isn’t trying too hard.


Strong messaging:


  • Leads with outcomes

  • Sounds specific

  • Reflects real customer pain points

  • Uses concrete language

  • Proves value instead of announcing it

  • Sounds like a person talking to another person


Examples:


Instead of:

Streamline operational efficiency through intelligent automation.


Try:

Eliminate hours of manual reporting every week.


Instead of:

Comprehensive legal representation.


Try:

Know exactly what happens next after an accident.


Instead of:

Customer-centric innovation.


Try:

Get answers from a real person in under five minutes.


Instead of sounding like a brochure, sound useful. And to be clear: sounding like a brochure is bad, even in a brochure.


How to Keep Teams From Sliding Back Into Marketing Mud


One of the best writers I’ve ever managed once made me literally laugh out loud when they declared, completely deadpan, out of nowhere:


“God, I hate feedback.”


It’s funny because writers learn quickly that egos are useless. Feedback is simply part of the job. We embrace it because it’s an important aspect of what we do. When you’re working with clients, strategists, and other stakeholders, you don’t work in a vacuum, and other perspectives bring the magic of healthy, productive collaboration.


But my writer friend wasn’t complaining about constructive feedback. They were responding to a litany of stakeholder comments that slowly transformed a well-written B2B article into something resembling a newspaper insert advertisement from 1987.


One of the hardest parts about good messaging is protecting it from stakeholder gravity. Copywriters and brand strategists have to guard clarity like they’re protecting a castle. Because the moment messaging becomes clear and effective, someone inevitably says:


“Can we make it sound more strategic?”


No. No, we cannot.


Or my personal favorite:


“I’m not wowed.”


With all due respect, it’s not about you, stakeholder, and “wow” is relative. It’s about your customer. And in the B2B world, what actually wows customers is clarity.


Here are a few gut-check questions I use to keep myself on the right path:


1. Could a customer repeat this back to someone else?

If not, it’s probably too abstract.


2. Does this explain what the product DOES or how it helps?

Features matter, but outcomes matter more.


3. Would an actual human actually say this out loud to another human?

If it sounds like a LinkedIn hallucination, rewrite it.


4. Could five competitors say the exact same thing?

If yes, it’s not positioning.


5. Is this written for buyers or internal stakeholders?

Many messaging decks slowly default into impressing executives instead of helping customers make decisions. Customers can feel the difference.


Don’t Remove Personality—Remove Vagueness


At this point, I realize I may sound aggressively anti-fun and anti-creative. But I’m not advocating for boring brands. I’m advocating for clear ones.


Good messaging can still be fun to write and sound:


  • Premium

  • Aspirational

  • Polished

  • Emotional

  • Creative


You can absolutely still be bold. But the goal is to sound clear. If you truly put yourself in your customers’ shoes, clear, direct messaging starts sounding hella sexy:


“Eliminate 10+ hours of manual work every week.”


If you really understand the impact of saving your customer that much time—if you can equate it to dollars saved—that message hits the spot. It’s not about innovative growth agents, but dang, eliminating 10 hours of manual work every week? So attractive to B2B orgs—because relevance, clarity, and relief are all persuasive.


The Best Messaging Can Feel Almost Too Simple


Here’s the annoying truth about effective messaging:


Internally, it often feels underwhelming. It usually isn’t dramatic, it doesn’t look like it would win an award, and nobody in your brainstorming session is going to think you’re the next Shakespeare.


First of all, Shakespeare was kind of a miserable guy. But also, in the B2B real world, that “underwhelming” messaging often performs better. And there’s nothing sexier than sales. When you see it work, you change your perspective on using creative work to drive sales. It’s because customers don’t reward complexity, and they always remember the company that explained the problem clearly—and the company that sounded human.


Most of all, B2B buyers remember the company that made them feel less overwhelmed. The best B2B marketing copy usually doesn’t sound like marketing. It sounds like someone is finally explaining the problem clearly.


Break These Chains of Loving Marketing Jargon


If you’re reading this and just now realizing that you, too, have fallen victim to the marketing jargon trap, it’s okay. It happens to literally all of us. But give yourself a leg up on the competition. Talk with our B2B messaging experts to see how you can use messaging to give your sales pipeline more action.



 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page